Why We Love Tv Anti Heroes - 1374 Words

Daniel Holland April 13, 2014 Why We Love TV’s Anti-Heroes Is it possible today’s generation gradually evolved into an era in which selfishness and evil overpowers good? Over the past years society perceives the idea of a hero differently than it was perceived in the 21st century, nevertheless impacts our society hugely. It is no surprise why youth of today enjoy T.V. shows that are driven by torture, killing, drugs and drama. In fact these are among the T.V. shows with higher ratings. Hero is characterized as a person of good character who performs beneficial acts towards a community and influence an individual self-concept in a good manner. Today, the new hero is the anti-hero and his morally reprehensible conduct is excused by a†¦show more content†¦All while committing a massive amount of crimes and killing. However, this American series was ranked the highest T.V series of all times. This televised show is an example of the type of entertainment our culture and youth in particular is driven and interested in watching. Traditional heroes are no longer appealing in today’s evolving culture because they represent unattainable expectation, and feel unrealistic because they do not portray realistic behavior throughout today’s society’s lifestyle. Instead, this culture is driven by the â€Å"underworld† of the anti-heroes. Stephen Garrets argues, â€Å"Because it appears that no one on TV can be truly good or evil anymore, we’re suffering from what it called â€Å"anti-hero overload† (320). Evidently, being definitively upright no longer appeals the audience who continue to tune in to T.V. shows such as Dexter, The Sopranos, Breaking Bad to name a few. All have in common a massive production of killing and torture and are among the highest rating televised shows. In a recent study Courtney Subramanian states, â€Å"Breaking Bad wrapped up its five-season run this year with an episode that was estimated to have been downloade d 4.2 million times. The show had an average of 10.28 million viewers tuned in on television per episode.† Breaking bad surpassed many greatShow MoreRelatedEssay Signs of Life in the USA841 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿Calley Hagen Matt Montoya English 101 14 October 2014 A Response to Stephen Garrett’s â€Å"Why We Love TV’s Anti-heroes† In the reading, â€Å"Why We Love TV’s Anti-heroes† by Stephen Garrett, he points out that anti-heroes are becoming more popular than the traditional hero. Garrett states, â€Å"the word hero is abused in the news, the sports reports, and even in conversation† (318). For example tabloids recognize someone who battles a drug addiction and overcomes it or a substitute kicker for the footballRead MoreWhy We Love TVs Anti-heroes544 Words   |  2 Pages Why we love TVs Anti-Heroes? Todays TV protagonists are very different from those of early television, but we still love them.Why? In his article, Stephen Garret starts to emphasize the point that our favorite television characters are actually extremely corrupt and morally ambiguous people. He argues that characters who always do the right thing no longer hold any interest to the average person because they are predictable. A lot of people are considered TV affected, so probably the term anti-heroesRead MoreViolence in America: The Representation of Violence in the Media505 Words   |  2 Pagesthose committed by infamous serial killers, inspire the most attention. As said by Jeff Lindsay, creator of the book series that inspired the wildly-popular television program, Dexter, â€Å"We’re sickened and disgusted, but we need to know. And the more we know about the scene, the more we really are horrified† (â€Å"Sympathy for the Devils†). Violence, especially committed by this special class of felons, is enthralling. News reports play a role in this strange attraction, as it is through the news that peopleRead More From Homer’s Odyssey to Star Wars - The Unchanging Path of the Hero2789 Words   |  12 Pages In the fiction world heroes have been one of the most entertaining figures. It has always been fun and interesting to read about heroic stories and about different obstacles that heroes had overcome. When someone mentions the word hero it is more likely to think of characters like Batman or James Bond, but it is for sure that if we had the chance to ask the same question centuries before, the answer would have been different. From comics or TV it is seen that heroes change physically and spirituallyRead MoreEssay on Cinemas Role in Society1719 Words   |  7 PagesInternet. In particular the visual environment of the electronic media is greatly attracting the print media in all its forms. How many children read comic books these days? Most would rather watch cartoons, or play arcade games or hand-held video games. We will be focusing on cinema and how it has culturally played a role in society. The 1990s have been a significant time for film and video. Nineteen ninety-five was the one-hundredth birthday of the movies (Film theory and criticism, 1985). In 1996 theRead MoreRepresentation Of Teenagers And Stereotypes That Are Associated With Them Through The Media? Essay2192 Words   |  9 Pagesdefinition A teenager, or teen, is a young person whose age falls within the range from 13–19. They are called teenagers because their age number ends with teen. Today Grady and I will be adressing the represenatation of teenagers in the media and how and why they are percieved the way they are. All teens go through similar phases. The need for independence, a separate identity, testing authority. It s part of growing up; it s also linked to developmental changes in the brain that will eventually helpRead MoreThe Discussion of Homosexuality in Comic Books1980 Words   |  8 Pagesscript: â€Å"Do you have to hide your sexuality at work? Discrimination is illegal. Fight it.† There are forums and social websites on the Internet supporting the LGBTQ community. There are discussions on TV with public figures and celebrities, short interviews with people on the streets. There are Movies and TV-shows addressing the issue in one way or another, experimenting with LGBTQ characters and watching the reaction of fans, testing the waters. Twelve states have approved same-sex marriage legislationRead MoreBreaking Bad And Orange Is The New Black3602 Words   |  15 Pagesinteresting to examine both TV series from a critical point of view to understand the concepts and ideaâ€⠄¢s used to convey diversity. Both Breaking Bad (BB) and OITNB address the issues of diversity in a social context. By evaluating and criticizing several forms of diversity, we can see how each show either accepts or challenges our perception of diversity in the mainstream industry. Also by critically breaking down character roles, scenes, and themes of both TV series, we can understand how influencedRead More America Essay5829 Words   |  24 Pagesall evil, in order to make life worth living. American History is no exemption. Our history books contain heroes. Men and women displayed to be as perfect in life as Christ himself. Their lives are relived through the typed paragraphs, their faults extinct, their miracles numerous. This is a fabrication. A lie is a lie if only half the truth is told. When genocide is remembered, we make the victims savages; this is monstrous. When Vietnam is forgotten, this is a bubble community that believesRead MoreANIME ADDICTION2849 Words   |  12 Pagesaddiction 1.culture 2.fashion 3.language 4.social interaction C.Negative effects of anime addiction 1.health 2.immoral activities 3.money disposal Conclusion. The rapid rise of anime has seen much controversy in this generation. We are bombarded with the popularity of anime where many people especially teenagers around the world were involved. anime Addiction is actually a very serious problem for it involves many people where only themselves can solve it. The history of anime

Electrical Engineering - 819 Words

As a graduate student, I will undertake research and coursework in Electrical Engineering to enhance my competencies in this field. I intend to complete my masters degree in order to pursue my doctorate. The research that I am most interested in pursuing at Northeastern University surrounds the optical properties of MEMS devices, and the development of substrate-based fast electro-optical interfaces. My interest in this area stems from my undergraduate study in MEMs development for tri-axial accelerometers. nbsp; Engineering has been a key interest of mine since childhood. While still in grade school I enjoyed listening to my father, an electrical engineer, teach me about advances in technology, and was always eager to hear†¦show more content†¦nbsp; At the heart of my interest is the advancement of man in concert with his environment. My personal philosophy of life will matter greatly during my study and after its completion. That is why I devote time to reflection on my goals and their implications. Money has never been a motivator for my work, nor do I think it will be in the future. However, as a professional and a graduate, I realize that my earning potential will be significant. That is why I also commit myself to charity and fairness. In the past I have been a member of the Boy Scouts of America, and have achieved the rank of Eagle Scout. In the course of my experience in that organization, I learned respect and moral value. Now, as a member of the IEEE, I value my professional standing and its commensurate moral implications. Ethics in engineering is as important as technical skill, and as such I intend to uphold my own ethical obligations to the best of my ability. nbsp; As a Northeastern University student, I would commit all that I have to offer to my study. I intend to pursue research in MEMS technology. At Rowan University as an undergraduate student I have already conducted some research and development of MEMS sensors for military applications, resulting in publication. An article, written by myself and my project member David Bowen and edited by our advisor Dr. Robert Krchnavek, was published in the NAVSEA IntelligentShow MoreRelatedMechanical Engineering : Electrical Engineering1277 Words   |  6 PagesElectrical Engineering Electrical Engineering is â€Å" The branch of engineering concerned with the generation, transmission, distribution, and use of electricity. Its two main branches are power engineering and electronics (including telecommunications). Electrical engineering emerged in the late 19th century with the mathematical formulation of the basic laws of electricity by James Clark Maxwell, followed by the development of such practical applications as the Bell telephone, Edison’s incandescentRead MoreSop of Electrical Engineering999 Words   |  4 Pagesyoungsters of my generation. Indians are proving the worth of their merit and diligence on world platforms. The caliber to match international parameters is the vital need of the hour. This has motivated me to pursue a Master s course in Electrical Engineering at your school. You have the best research facilities, the latest equipment and the dynamic curriculum, which will enable me to understand and apply modern techniques to meet diffe rent needs. Your faculty does not only teach what is knownRead MoreThe Field Of Electrical Engineering1548 Words   |  7 PagesThe field of Electrical Engineering is the field into the future. Electrical Engineers learn electricity’s principles, interact with electrical properties, and imagine its application for the future. Without any end in sight, the field is vast and growing with several thousands of companies dominating the field today. Additionally, electrical engineering is proving to be a stable career choice as there is a growing market for electrical innovations, advancing technology to assist in the educationRead MoreElectrical Engineering Concepts And Not Mechanical Engineering1392 Words   |  6 PagesAs a second year BEng Electronic and Electrical Engineering student a project had to be devised which would consist of Electrical Engineering concepts and not Mechanical Engineering. Groups were made so that tasks could be carried out by each member. Several project ideas were then made by each group member. The ideas which were thought of by myself included a hybrid solar and wind battery charger, a parking sensor and also remote control blinds (Appendix A). Research had to be carried out onRead MoreElectrical Engineering : Electrical Engineer1150 Words   |  5 PagesElectrical Engineering: Just like any engineer, electrical engineers are also problem solvers. They design, invent and test newly developed equipment that came from a simple idea. They deal with electricity, electro-magnetism and electronics. Electrical engineers also deal with telecommunication, power, control systems and signal processing. Electrical engineers will usually use computers in order to design their ideas, yet some still prefer to hand draw everything. They will usually focus on productsRead MoreSample Resume : Electrical Engineering Essay1880 Words   |  8 PagesHyperloop A Seminar Report Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Technology in Electrical Engineering Submitted By: Rushi Patel (14BEE093) Romil Patel (14BEE092) Under Guidance of: Prof D.M. Mehta Department of Electrical Engineering Institute of Technology, Nirma University Ahmedabad – 382481 May - 2016 Department of Electrical Engineering Institute of Technology Nirma University, Ahmedabad Gujarat - 382481 CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the seminarRead MoreElectrical Engineering1945 Words   |  8 PagesElectrical Engineering Work Performed Electrical Engineers research, develop, design, and test electronic components, products, and systems for commercial, industrial, medical, military, and scientific applications (Cosgrove 749). They are concerned with devices that use small amounts of electricity that make up electronic components such as integrated circuits and microprocessors. By applying principles and techniques of electronic engineering they design, develop, and manufacture productsRead MoreSample Resume : Electrical Engineering3881 Words   |  16 Pages(UNIT I,II SHREE POWER) Student: Vishal Kasotia Project Guide: Mr Ajay Sharma. College: Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee Course: Electrical Engineering with Specialization in Power Electronics (EPE) Enrolment Number: 12212014 Internship Period: May 11, 2015 – July 3, 2015 Summer Internship 2015 Submitted by Vishal Kasotia 4th yr (IDD) in Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee May – July, 2015 Page | 1 Acknowledgement I owe a debt of gratitude to Mr. Ajay Sharma for beingRead MoreElectrical Engineering And The Field Of Engineering Essay1855 Words   |  8 PagesScience, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, the fourth is Finance, and fifth is Information Technology. Those I just listed are the five results from the career clusters activity we did in class. These clusters, I’m all interested in, but there is one that stands out to me and it’s Engineering. The reason why Engineering stands out to me is because it’s my major. Electrical Engineering is the field I would like to go in. Electrical engineering is a field of engineering that generally dealsRead MoreElectrical Engineering: Past and Future Essay1894 Words   |  8 PagesStatistics defines an electrical engineer as someone that â€Å"designs, develops, tests, and supervises the manufacturing of electrical equipment such as electric motors, radar and navigation systems, communications systems, or power generation equipment.† Electrical engineers work with but are not limited to electricity, electronics and electromagnetism (What Do Electrical Engineers Do?). These engineers can work in labs, offices or on the floor of some major industries. Electrical engineers may solve

Do Animals Have Rights Essay Research Paper free essay sample

Do Animals Have Rights Essay, Research Paper Do Animals Have Rights? Should animate beings be harmed to profit world? This pressing inquiry has been around for at least the past two centuries. During the early 19th century, carnal experiments emerged as an of import method of scientific discipline and, in fact, marked the birth of experimental physiology and neuroscience as we presently know it. There were, nevertheless, guidelines that existed even back so which restricted the conditions of experimentation. These early regulations protected the animate beings, in the sense that all processs performed were done so with every bit small hurting as possible and entirely to look into new truths. Adopting the animate beings? positions, they would likely non hold that these types of ordinances were much protection, sing the unwanted hurting that they felt first followed by what would finally be their decease. But, this is precisely the ethical issue at manus. For the most portion, animate being rights are debated in respects to two issues: 1 ) whether animate beings have the ability to apologize or travel through a logical idea procedure and 2 ) whether or non animate beings are able to see hurting. However, ? it will non make merely to mention differences between worlds and animate beings in order to supply a rational footing for excepting animate beings from the range of our moral deliberations? ( Rollin 7 ) . This, Bernard Rollin claims, would be silly. He says that to make this is comparable to a individual with a full caput of hair excepting all barefaced work forces from his moral deliberations merely because they are barefaced. The true ethical inquiry involved is, ? do these differences serve to warrant a moral difference? ? ( Rollin 7 ) . Besides, which differences between worlds and non-humans are important adequate to be considered in finding the non-human? s destiny? Over the old ages, many differences have been proposed. Some theorize that rights depend upon the ability to possess involvement, which in bend depend upon the ability to organize verbal preparations, for illustration. If this were so, so it would govern out the possibility of rights for most animate beings, with possibly the exclusion of some Primatess. But, as Rodd provinces, ? existences incapable of possessing echt rights might possess moral position in virtuousness of other qualities, such as the capacity for enduring? ( Rodd 4 ) . So, it is easy seen how many positions have accumulated over clip. The undertaking of finding carnal rights has besides come into the context of analyzing these built-in differences on qualitative and quantitative degrees. We can state, for case, that on a qualitative degree, a cow is less intelligent than a human. But, we must so find, on a quantitative degree, how much more stupid that cow truly is when compared to worlds. And, one time we decide th at, we must so make up ones mind if that border of intelligence is adequate for us worlds to butcher that cow in order to profit human sort from its merchandises. Questions like this and others, which are really similar, have become the snowballing argument over the inquiry of animate being rights. Where do we pull the line? How do we find the value of another being? s life? Well, up to this point, we as a society have been pretty confident in judging the lives of 1000000s of animate beings worldwide ( or so we can reason by looking at the figure of animate beings sacrificed each twelvemonth for the intent of experiment, instruction, goods, etc. ) . We must first step back and analyze the ethical quandary at manus and so continue to carefully weigh its effects. If we examine the inquiry of animate being rights carefully, it is most frequently viewed as an ethical quandary as opposed to an economic or cultural issue. This is due to the fact that a life is at interest and we, as worlds, must make up ones mind if we are justified to take that life, while in the procedure bring downing agony, in order to profit society as a whole. We must about play God, in a sense, in make up ones minding which carnal lives are expendable and which are valuable plenty to let to stay living. This ethical quandary about assigns a value to life. The argument over carnal rights asks if it is deserving killing guiltless animate beings in order to profit such points as instruction, material production or human medical specialty. Looking at this statement, one might state that worlds are avaricious and disrespectful of God? s creative activity. But, are we supposed to seek experimental medical specialties and surgical processs on worlds and put on the line their dece ase? Or is it better to educate pupils about anatomy and physiology through the forfeit of animate beings? Ethically, does the terminal justify the agencies? David Lee Miller argues that for us to prosecute in a purely ethical conversation on the subject of animate being rights, ? we would make good to suspend our single stuff involvements in the result of the treatment? ( Miller 3 ) . I agree with Miller here that to talk of the finding of animate being rights on an ethical degree, which is where it should be, we surely can non be concerned with how nice it would be to hold a full-length mink coat or a fabulous alligator bag. It must come down to the moralss of killing an animate being for the interest of the value of its life and non for the interest of weighing the sum of money you will have for the sale of one hundred lbs of beef. But, merely by looking at how big this argument has grown, we can see that doing this separation is really hard. Often times, stuff involvements get i n the manner and take our ethical idea astray. But can it be alright to let these involvements to take charge? This all depends on your ethical point of view sing the assignment of rights to animate beings. If you believe their rights to be non-existent, so what do you care if 1000000s of them are killed? On the other manus, if you see all life as equal so the? senseless? violent death of animate beings is comparable to the slaughter of guiltless human existences. There are many point of views refering this issue that need to be dealt with in order to to the full hold on the mentality of those so profoundly involved in the battle to find what, if any, rights that animate beings possess. Tom Regan, a professor of doctrine at North Carolina State University and one of the taking advocates of this theory, claims that animate beings have? rights? ? the right to be treated in a certain manner. Regan claims that animate beings have penchants, ends, and most significantly, mental provinces that enter into the account of their behaviour. In his words, animate beings are? topics of a life? merely like worlds and each topic of life contains? built-in value? . What Regan means by this is that by executing experiments on animate beings, you are cut downing them to mere tools and go againsting their basic rights. He justifies his theory by utilizing an illustration incorporating the retarded and insane. He says that if these types of individuals are allowed moral rights, despite their inability to believe rationally, so all mammals should hold moral rights. Besides, he states that know aparting on the footing of species is truly basically merely the same moral error as favoritis m on the footing of race or sex. Discriminating on these footings is morally irrelevant and fails to harmonize equal consideration, states Regan. Another theory that is against inhuman treatment to animate beings in such a mode is an attack that is epitomized in the Hagiographas of both St. Thomas Aquinas and Immanuel Kant. This point of view differs from Regan? s because it suggests that animate beings are non needfully direct objects of moral concern. However, there are decidedly certain things that are non morally justifiable in handling animate beings in this mode. With this position, inhuman treatment to animate beings is out, non because animate beings are objects of moral attending, but instead because of the psychological fact that people who brutalize animate beings may be given to act in the same mode toward other people. Still, this theory denies that animate beings should be used as experimental tools, although it does so in a manner that leaves the possibility of their rights really fuzzy. A concluding of import theory that supports giving animate beings their rights involves the subject of hurting. Do animate beings experience pain? Harmonizing to David Lee Miller, if non-human animate beings act like they are sing hurting, so they likely are. If non-human animate beings act like they experience hurting, but someway do non, provinces Miller, so it would be unusual coincidence. Miller claims that even for those who are deemed non to exhibit qualities such as consciousness, they should still be given the benefit of the uncertainty. This theory is justified because it relates really straight how worlds and non-humans portion really similar reactions to the same stimulation, in this instance, hurting. On the other manus, there are several theories that affirm animate beings should non be assigned rights. Most of these theories revolve around the impression that animate beings do non hold the ability to ground, which is considered the most of import characteristic of worlds and is what sets them apart from non-humans. One of the most persuasive grounds normally offered for excepting animate beings from being direct objects of moral consideration is the claim that whereas adult male possesses an immortal psyche, animate beings are non so blessed. This theory has dominated the Catholic Church and the popular head for centuries. The protagonists of this theory believe that since there exists a deficiency of psyche in non-humans, there besides exists a deficiency of ground, which in bend, demotes animate beings below worlds and causes us to see them as inferior. Once we see them as inferior, it is highly easy to deny their rights. Another point of view refering the denial of animate be ing rights is seen widely in the scientific community. Most scientists believe that since they have already demonstrated that human benefits are derived from carnal experimentation, there is no demand to supply any ethical statement that justifies harming 1000000s of animate beings each twelvemonth. They say that animate beings provide excessively much human benefit ( nutrient, transit, amusement ) for us to be concerned with any moral facets of whether or non to maintain harming them. Finally, it is believed that merely creatures capable of moving morally are themselves meriting of moral concern. This theory states that moral Torahs and rules are the merchandise of a kind of societal contract, which merely rational existences are capable of take parting in. The contract is an understanding among lone rational persons to handle others in a certain manner, provided that they are themselves treated the same manner in return. Since animate beings can non come in into understandings suc h as these, chiefly because they lack ground and linguistic communication, they can non be considered objects of moral concern. Looking at both sides of the statement, I see a much stronger instance for the usage of animate beings in experimentation, instruction, and overall human benefit. First of all, I think that there is manner excessively much human trust on animate beings to halt their usage for human benefit. They provide us with trade goods such as meat, safe medical specialties ( indirectly ) , and a greater apprehension of anatomy which allows 1000000s of worlds to be saved each twelvemonth. Some life signifier has to? take one for the squad? , in a sense, so which 1 would you take? Would you decease for an animate being? Besides, some carnal advocators say that the mammal is valued and that its belongingss are alone. This seems like a big contradiction in the sense of a denial of equality if you ask me. If the cardinal issue is the animate being? s life, why do they set some life on a base and leave others on the land? Then where can you pull the line? Do fleas have the same built-in value as apes? To me, all animate beings are every bit inferior since none of them can ground or show a logical idea. I see animate beings as really crude as a whole. Besides, since high quality depends evidently on differences in calm, some inquiry which difference is most valuable. Some suggest that animate beings possess many features that are superior to worlds, such as odor and hearing. However, it is evidently ground that dominates over everything else since we worlds are the onl Y 1s that possess it and are evidently the most advanced. Staying on the subject of ground, I turn to the theories and positions held by one of the great German philosophers of the Enlightenment, Immanuel Kant. Kant argues that merely rational existences can number as moral agents and, even more significantly for my intent in this paper, that the range of moral concern extends merely to rational existences. This impression of ground is cardinal to the doctrine of Kant. A big facet of the ownership of ground in Kant? s position is the ability to get at cognition that can non be shown to be false by experience and can be known to be true merely by idea. A good illustration of this a priori cognition is, ? The amount of the angles of a trigon is 180 grades? . As everyone who had studied geometry knows, that statement can be proven by ground, and one time it has been proved, we can state that we know it must be true. The of import portion of this construct for this paper is the fact that Kant claims that merely human existences can possess this type of cognition, and merely the ownership of this cognition can let a being to asseverate opinions that claim universally. This thought of cosmopolitan claims brings me to Kant? s thought of the? categorical jussive mood? . This, he believes, is the right rule for finding how rational existences ought to handle one another, or themselves for that affair. The? categorical jussive mood? provinces that one should neer do an exclusion for one? s ego by moving on grounds that one could non will every other rational being to move on. He states, ? I ought neer to move except in such a manner that I can besides will that my axiom should go cosmopolitan jurisprudence? ( Kant 70 ) . In Kant? s deontological system, universalising the exclusion destroys the regulation. He besides formulates an thought of responsibility in which he claims that, ? Duty is the necessity to move out of fear for the [ moral ] jurisprudence? ( Kant 68 ) , and, ? human action is morally good if it is done from res ponsibility entirely? ( category lineation ) . These statements reflect on Kant? s thought of seeing moral actions on a footing of terminals and agencies. Kant, believing that the lone rational existences are human existences, provinces that we should value human existences merely for their map as rational existences and regard that map for its ain interest, or their terminal, irrespective of their utility for us. We should neer handle worlds entirely as a agency to some terminal we happen to hold. Looking at Kant? s statements, I believe that he would portion my overall position that animate beings do non possess rights. Kant believes that merely human existences are rational due to the fact that merely worlds can entertain, understand, and formulate statements that are cosmopolitan in range. So, merely human existences autumn within the range of moral concern. Animals, he claims, can non hold a sense of a priori cognition because they are tied to stimulus and response reactions. For illustration, animate beings may react to this peculiar fire in a manner that indicates its consciousness that this fire is unsafe here and now, but merely worlds have the capacity to understand that all fires are potentially unsafe. Besides, Kant states that merely rational existences are? terminals in themselves? , intending that lone rational existences should be valued for their ain interest. Kant really states, as noted by Rollin, that? Animals are? simply as agencies to an terminal. That ter minal is adult male? ( Rollin 19 ) . Therefore, in Kant? s position, if animate beings are non rational and lone rational existences should be seen as terminals, animate beings are merely a agency with a certain instrumental value available for human development. However, Kant does asseverate that we should avoid inhuman treatment to animate beings. He does non belie himself, though. He desires to avoid inhuman treatment because he believes that this kind of behaviour can take to cruelty towards work forces or, on a lower graduated table, that inhuman treatment to an carnal causes human injury since it is harm to his/her belongings. While Immanuel Kant would clearly hold a distinguishable position on animate being rights, other philosophers, such as John Stuart Mill, might non be as easy inclined to take a base either manner. Mill believes in a doctrine called utilitarianism. Mill? s attack, which is sometimes called Hedonic Utilitarianism, holds that pleasance and pleasance entirely is per se good, while hurting and hurting entirely is per se evil. To find what the best effects would be in any given instance, they think, we must find which alternative available to us will convey about the optimal balance of pleasance over hurting for everyone affected by the result. In other words, they want to bring on the most pleasance for the greatest figure of people and the least hurting for the smallest figure of people. Pleasure, in their position, denotes felicity, while hurting denotes unhappiness. Utilitarianism takes into history the pleasances and strivings of everyone affected by the result of what we do. It will non let us to see the pleasances and strivings of some and disregard the pleasances and strivings of others. Mill was a truster in the highest good, which he states, will follow the rule of public-service corporation. The rule of public-service corporation argues that action that produces felicity is morally right. His thought of the rule of public-service corporation, hence, is a consequentialist theory, or one that determines our moral way through our effects. My readings of Mill? s point of views take me to the decision that utilitarians would non take a peculiar stance on animate being rights until they had examined the full range of the scene. Looking at this issue from a useful position, an animate being? s rights are wholly dependent upon the issue of pleasance versus hurting. First of all, they would hold to make up ones mind if animate beings really felt hurting. As stated earlier in the essay, some hypothesize that animate beings feel pain merely because their physical reactions to stimuli that cause humans hurting are really near to the physical reactions of worlds under the same stimulation. If it was concluded that animate beings did in fact feel hurting, Mill, or any useful, would hold to take every animal? s involvement into history. This includes everyone from a adult male who needs a baboon bosom to last, to a adult female who enjoys mink coats, to the animate being who feels the hurting from both of the old instances. Since the utilitarians want to cut down as much hurting as possible, they would necessitate to make up ones mind which would be lesser: the hurting felt by the animate beings during experimentation or the hurting felt by worlds if there were a deficiency of carnal experimentation. In the terminal, I believe that the rule of public-service corporation would hold to steer the utilitarians in their determination whether or non to delegate rights to animate beings. Moral rightness sing carnal rights would hold to come as a consequence of weighing the pleasances and strivings of both worlds and animate beings and make up ones minding what is best for mammals as a whole. Both Kant and Mill show a figure of highly valid points, along with some weak statements, in their philosophical positions as applied to animal rights. Kant? s review of ground is really logical as seen in his thought of a priori cognition. Merely worlds could be capable of such a undertaking since animate beings by and large do react to instinct. Evidence of this claim sets worlds apart from animate beings through one of the most of import statements sing the issue of carnal rights: the ability to ground. However, despite the advantage of ground, rational existences should non be the lone existences that are? terminals in themselves? . I view all existences as holding an terminal in themselves, including animate beings. However, I see carnal experimentation and forfeit as a necessary agency for human endurance. Traveling to Mill, his thought of pleasance and hurting has possible strong points in that hurting is attempted to be reduced and pleasance is attempted to be magnified. This thought seems like a cosmopolitan good that can be easy accepted. However, this thought is merely seen every bit good to those who receive pleasance. The animate beings, for illustration, lose in the instance of animate being experimentation since they receive the majority of the hurting. Besides, the useful thought that you must see the pleasance and hurting of everyone and so come to a decision seems excessively hard and far-fetched. This construct should be restricted to sing merely the pleasance and hurting of those straight involved, which is hard in this instance since about all people and animate beings are implicated into this quandary. Despite the strengths of both Kant? s and Mill? s statements, I do non believe either one is single-handedly disposed to do an all-knowing determination sing the bestowing of animate being rights. Kant? s policy portrays animate beings as the non-rational retainers of adult male. This position could non keep up in today? s carnal rights argument because it is excessively rough and does non take into history the animate being as holding a intent in life for its ain interest. Mill? s point of position is excessively hedonic, even though it aims to cut down hurting at the same clip. Religious governments might even claim the useful position to be atheist since its construction is so extremely aimed at pleasance. Finally, I ask this inquiry to one who is wholly against the slaughter of animate beings for any ground. If large, gross outing rats infested your house, would you round up each one and liberate them in the forests, or would you put tonss of rattraps around the house or possibly name an eradicator? My point is that if it doesn? T threaten you straight, you may non recognize the full extent of the ordeal. Sing the earnestness of the ethical quandary of confering carnal rights or non, and weighing all of the opposing positions, I come to the decision that siding with those who promote the usage of animate beings for human benefit seems more logical and practical, despite the fact that life is lost. Bibliography Annotated b4f Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Harper A ; Row Publishers. New York, New York. 1964. -Used Kant? s text in order to put down his rules and beliefs. Chiefly used merely for background into his theories. Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. 1957 -Used this to give background of Utilitarianism, including theories and rules. Miller, David Lee. The Argument About Animal Properties. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.sunyit.edu/~miller1/PROP.HTM. 29 October 2000. -Helped with theory on hurting and gave many good pro-rights ratings. Orlans, F. Barbara. In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation. Oxford University Press. New York, New York. 1993. -Provided the initial history information. Besides, gave a few thoughts about both pros and cons of rights Regan, Tom. The Case for Animal Rights. University of California Press. Berkeley, Los Angeles. 1983. -Since Regan is really pro-rights, his book helped with that portion of the paper. Rodd, Rosemary. Biology, Ethics, and Animals. Oxford University Press. New York, New York. 1990. -Helped with the ethical facet of the paper ( portion B ) . Besides contains values of animate beings and worlds. Rollin, Bernard E. Animal Rights and Human Morality. Prometheus Books. Buffalo, New York. 1981. -Contained facet of the psyche and relates theories of Kant ( really helpful! ) Smart, J.J.C. ; Williams, Bernard. Utilitarianism: for and against. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 1973. -Used to develop strength and failings of factory? s thoughts Smith, Norman K. Immanuel Kant? s Critique of Pure Reason. The Humanities Press. New York, New York. 1933. -This text was used meagerly to develop Kant? s apprehension of ground. Sorabji, Richard. Animal Minds and Human Ethical motives: The Origins of the Western Debate. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, New York. 1993. -Goes through and evaluates facets of worlds and compares them to animate beings.

Teenager Substance Abuse free essay sample

For youth leaders, this is a study of a teenager who has a substance abuse problem and was released from a detention center. It involves a seventeen old male who abuses marijuana, alcohol, and ecstasy; and is also the son of two ministers. This story should help readers understand the dynamics involved with a teenage drug user and will also help youth leaders develop effective skills for reaching out to a troubled teen in need of support, especially after incarceration. A seventeen-year-old male, Jimmy, lived in a middle-class suburb. Jimmy was referred to me by his sister, ecause she felt my knowledge and past experiences might be helpful in reaching him. Later on I decided to meet and conduct an interview at his house, with his sister present in an adjacent room. During the conversation, several facts emerged. Jimmy had been in trouble with the legal system, mostly for drug possession and motor vehicle infractions. We will write a custom essay sample on Teenager Substance Abuse or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page He said he had been kicked out of high school because of his drug use. He had been using alcohol and marijuana since he was about 13. He had more recently been taking ecstasy. When asked why he used drugs, he claimed it educed his boredom and provided a way to escape and have fun. Additionally, it was discerned that his father worked long hours (in the mental health field), and was basically absent from the family. Later, I learned that his father denied his sons habits. The family, which also includes a younger 16-year-old brother, had gone to see a therapist but Jimmy was an unwilling participant. Jimmy noted that he does have a problem with authority figures, like the police, because he believes they are corrupt. Jimmy did admit that police have a Job to do, in terms of protecting people rom harmful practices. Jimmy also realized that there are consequences of drug use and that he was headed for a state prison sentence if he did not improve his actions. He learned that his mother could be arrested under law if he had drugs in her house; this bothered Jimmy. I researched about what state prison was like and told him all about it. Throughout the intervention, then I listened and affirmed the young man without condoning his bad behavior. In the end, I gained his trust and told him that his personal feelings would be kept confidential. I recommended that Jimmy be areful when he with his peers, and I encouraged him to select a friend who would help hold him accountable. I shared my phone number with him. Jimmys behavior improved. The relationship between teens and drugs has been around for decades; however, this is not what you would call positive. Substance abusing (which is using drugs or alcohol in ways than can cause physical harm) is often associated with crime. But why do youths take drugs? Youth take drugs for the following reasons: social disorganization, peer pressure, family factors, emotional, or rational choice. Social isorganization deals with drug abuse to poverty and disorganized urban environment. Drug use by youth minority group members has been tied to factors such as racial prejudice, low-esteem, social status, and stress produced from environment. The National Youth Survey found that drug use tends to be higher among urban youths. problem was bad and the police officer and teachers that worked at my high school had no idea whatsoever what was going on right under their noses seriously, I remember people at football games found this place behind a shed where no one went and they used to smoke and do drugs, it was bad. But of course no one could say anything about anything they saw otherwise that person will get death threats and get their tires slashed in the parking lot and have to go to homecoming fearing for their life. Like one time I remember this girl said something and everyone in the school hated her and she was instantly unpopular. So yes there is a huge drug problem and getting students to rat each other out is so not going to happen. In a perfect world maybe, but in the real world, not a chance. Jimmy is a classic case of a lonely teenager who is never with his parents and is basically always hanging out ith his friends which are a very bad influence. The pattern that I recognize from Jimmy is that he has been wanting to get his parents attention and the only way he gets it, is by consuming excessive alcohol or illegal drugs. Teens feel alone at home and family. They look for something attractive that pleases them. They dont get enough attention from parents. They were not used to get enough attention when they were kids. But when they were kids there were a lot of childish things that could make them busy and temporarily happy. But when they reach 14, those things can ot attract them anymore. They still suffer from lacking of attention and the things that could be a relief for them, have lost their attraction. So they look for new things. Definitely these new things cannot be found in family. They are already disappointed about family. Parents should be trained and educated about these things. They should know that all of these problems come because of lack of attention from one or both parents. One hour attention to children and teens saves hundreds of hours of therapy in future. It prevents a lot of problems that addiction is only one of them. By interviewing Jimmy I found that teenagers see taking / using drugs are Just a way of teenage-hood, most youth will try some sort of drug, maybe Just to try it out or maybe for a reason. This teen said he has taken drugs because it was something to do, and everyone else around him was doing it and it was seen cool to take drugs and that it was a way to escape from the real world. Interviewing Jimmy was very interesting because I could sort of relate what he is going through from when I was in high school. Luckily Jimmy is acting on time before he goes to the wrong path and becomes a failure in life.